Inscriptionism
These aren’t just physical characteristics; they’re universal truths encoded into the very nature of what it means to be a circle. The Circle as an Inscribed Entity Radius (r) Diameter (2r) Circumference (2πr) Area (πr²) π (pi)—a constant that transcends size or material No matter if it’s the orbit of a planet or the outline of a coin, the relational structure stays the same. It’s as if “circle-ness” comes with a built-in instruction set, waiting to be expressed in the real world. In Lawsin’s terms, these aren't just mathematical descriptions—they could be seen as inscriptive codes: The identity of the circle is preloaded with these embedded parameters. The moment an object satisfies those inscriptions, it manifests as a circle—regardless of scale, substance, or intention. So your insight is absolutely valid: inherent properties act like inscriptions, determining how an entity behaves or appears across contexts. That raises a deep question: if shapes like circles carry inscription...
